When I talk to other CEOs and business leaders, one thing keeps coming up: Regulation, or the lack thereof. This massive, complex issue is keeping a lot of us awake at night. We’re still operating in a regulatory gray area two years into the generative AI boom. But that hasn’t stopped compliance requirements from tightening across industries. The pressure is real and it’s only growing.
Let’s face it: Half-baked internal policies aren’t cutting it anymore. Businesses need governance strategies beyond the surface level and tools that provide instant content compliance. Looking ahead, I expect to see more companies leaning on external expertise in 2025 to stay ahead of compliance demands. The pace of regulation is accelerating and having strong, adaptable guardrails in place is no longer an option.
The Current State of AI Regulation
This year, we’ve already seen a series of new U.S. state-level AI regulations introduced or enacted. This is a clear continuation of last year’s efforts by state governments taking charge to fill the regulatory void as federal guidance for using the technology trailed behind. In fact, with President Trump repealing former President Biden’s AI Executive Order and Vice President JD Vance urging against excessive regulation in Europe, it’s likely federal regulation will take steps back.
However, this lack of clear federal regulation pushes companies to be more cautious. Especially with the breach of DeepSeek on the heels of its rapid rise, enterprises need to have proper safety measures in place. Without a unified framework, organizations will need to take proactive steps to manage AI risks, ensure compliance and establish internal guardrails to safeguard their innovation and reputation.
Why Internal Regulation Fails to Suffice
At Acrolinx, we wanted to understand how enterprises manage the challenges of AI regulation. To gain insight, we surveyed some of the world’s largest companies, including Fortune 500 organizations that rely on our solutions. We learned that nearly 75 percent of these enterprises have implemented internal measures to regulate AI as they wait for clearer federal guidelines.
For most organizations, these internal guardrails focus on governing how AI is used internally and ensuring compliance with their own standards and policies. But here’s the problem: Internal guidelines often fall short when it comes to addressing the full spectrum of generative AI risks.
These internal measures can miss critical gaps without alignment with broader industry or federal standards, exposing organizations to compliance, operational and reputational risks. In fact, the World Economic Forum found that 92% of generative AI users have leaked company data, despite employers having AI data guidelines. To keep pace with evolving regulations and protect against AI’s unique challenges, enterprises need a more robust, end-to-end approach to governance.
Content Compliance Solutions
Rather than relying solely on internal writing standards, I expect more companies to turn to sophisticated solutions tailored to organizational priorities, governmental compliance standards and industry-specific regulations.
In fact, as the regulatory landscape grows increasingly complex, I believe that content compliance solutions are the cost of entry for responsible AI use. Businesses that fail to adapt face not only operational risks but also legal, financial and reputational damage as the regulatory environment catches up to the realities of generative AI.
Take Content as an Example
Entering a prompt and receiving an instant response from AI is now commonplace. However, creating marketing content or responding to customer inquiries in highly regulated industries still necessitates a thorough legal and compliance review process. Marketing, legal and compliance teams are struggling to review content quickly enough to guarantee it remains both on-brand and compliant.
Organizations are navigating a minefield of risky content daily and they need more than just generative AI algorithms to ensure that they are not opening their brand up to risk. Having guardrails in place that will scan, score, fix and align content with brand style guides, content standards and industry regulation ensures that content is safe before it even makes its way out the door of your organization.
Why Guardrails are Critical to Modern Business Strategy
But content is just one use case. The rush to adopt generative AI has largely been about chasing efficiency gains. But as the technology matures, it’s also exposing glaring quality and compliance gaps — leaving companies vulnerable to operational failures and regulatory scrutiny. The missing piece? Governance. Without the proper guardrails, businesses face challenges in three key areas:
-
Scale: Generative AI relies on high-quality, reliable data to scale effectively. Scaling efforts risk producing uneven or poor-quality results.
-
Efficiency: Efficiency may be the goal, but it can’t come at the expense of compliance. Guardrails help organizations achieve efficiency gains without creating unnecessary exposure to regulatory or operational risks.
-
Risk mitigation: The risks tied to generative AI only grow as regulations evolve. Guardrails aren’t optional—they’re essential for navigating compliance demands while minimizing operational risk.
Without solid governance, generative AI’s potential can just as easily become a source of risk.
Governance in the Face of Rising Risk
Executives know compliance with AI regulations isn’t optional — and it won’t be cheap. Across industries, from healthcare to financial services, regulators are racing to catch up with the risks generative AI is creating. The result? A patchwork of evolving rules forces companies to navigate a maze of customized compliance roadmaps based on their industry, use cases and geographic footprint.
As regulations tighten, the stakes — and the risks — keep climbing. Organizations that fail to adapt face the risk of financial and reputational fallout. The answer? Strong governance and instant content compliance with clear guardrails. Compliance has become the ultimate marker of long-term business resilience.